Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) is a reliability metric that helps calculate how long it takes restore an asset to its intended operational capabilities.

Our second article on Reliability 101 covers MTTR – its importance, how to calculate it, and factors that influence the results.

Key Takeaways

  • Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) measures the average time needed to restore an asset to its fully operational capabilities
  • MTTR = Total Repair Time (in hours) / Total Number of Failures
  • The only way to accurately measure MTTR is by using a CMMS with the right workflow and timestamps that collects data from multiple sources
  • MTTR can provide useful insights that can drive your organization’s maintenance and reliability strategy

A key part to effective maintenance planning is implementing the right tools and processes to track performance. A common way to achieve this is by using reliability metrics to measure performance, identify areas of improvement, and validate the effectiveness of maintenance activities.

In this article we take an in-depth look at Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), a frequently used reliability metric that helps track maintenance efficiency, and how it can be used to influence an organization’s maintenance and reliability strategy.

What is Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)?

Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) measures the average time needed to restore an asset to its fully operational capabilities. It is a basic measurement of an asset’s maintainability.

MTTR is also useful for assessing the effectiveness of an organization’s maintenance plans and procedures as it helps with understanding how long it will take to repair or replace an asset and whether that timeframe makes sense from a cost-of-ownership and business continuity perspective.

How to calculate MTTR

Mean Time to Repair is calculated using the following formula:

MTTR = Total Repair Time (in hours) / Total Number of Failures

Repair Time = the time needed to restore an asset’s function after failure by repairing replacing the asset It begins from the moment the asset stops running to the time its operation is restored.

Failure = when an asset or component is unable to meet its expected performance. It does not always mean that the asset is inoperable, simply that it is not meeting operational or quality requirements.

The only way to accurately measure MTTR is by using a CMMS with the right workflow and timestamps that collects data from multiple sources.

An example workflow looks like this:

  1. An operator enters a correctly coded work order,
  2. A planner releases the work order,
  3. A technician adds their time to the work order, and
  4. The work order is closed on time

You would then use this data to analyze historical trends and show the patterns that are contributing to an extended MTTR.

What the results mean

A higher MTTR indicates a high failure to functional recovery time for an asset. Generally, this is telling you that there are inefficiencies within the repair process or the asset itself. A high MTTR for a single asset may indicate that there may be more training needed to troubleshoot and repair, or it could simply mean that the asset has reached the end of its useful lifecycle.

A lower MTTR means that failure to recovery time is faster, more efficient repair time and, therefore, would indicate that there is a healthy maintenance process in place.

Ways to reduce MTTR

Graphic to illustrate MTTR, a reliability failure metric

In addition to being able to calculate MTTR, you should also know what factors affect it and how these can be improved to reduce the amount of time it takes to repair an asset. Here are some of the key variables that influence MTTR.

Building internal processes that avoid unnecessary delays

The process of diagnosing the cause of an asset failure can often be the source of many delays.

To decrease repair time, creating a culture where everyone understands what needs to happen before something goes wrong is of high importance. You should establish clear roles and responsibilities within each team and assign members to specific tasks. Make sure that they know when others are working on another project.

If failures are not adequately tracked and documented, then this can lead to inaccurate estimates of MTTR. Therefore, setting up an effective communication channel between the teams responsible for repairs will help to facilitate and speed up the diagnose process and to narrow down the cause of the failure.

Improving the speed of diagnosing and reporting a failure

What is the current process in place in the event a critical asset fails?

Is it fast enough to get the problem fixed quickly? If not, how do you plan to improve it?

Do technicians have a full picture of the asset’s history that is both documented and standardized? Is there a system in place (i.e. CMMS) to serve as a central hub for this information?

A CMMS will help with diagnosing and reporting by keeping track of:

  • The history of maintenance tasks performed,
  • Previous failures and how they were resolved, and
  • The location of replacement parts and components

An efficient diagnosis and reporting system will make the recovery more efficient for the technician, which will reduce the time needed to restore the asset to functional operation.

Developing maintenance plans for critical assets

A common cause for a high MTTR is not planning for the eventual failure of an asset until it is too late. Developing a maintenance program early on is a key method for reducing the extended downtime of an asset.

For example, condition-based maintenance is a strategy that uses statistical analysis to pinpoint and remedy potential problems before they become serious issues, thereby reducing the amount of time that it is down. It also helps to ensure that your organization does not spend more time or money fixing equipment that no longer has any value.

A critical spare parts and equipment plan

For an organization to perform emergency repairs, they need to ensure that they always have necessary spares.

A bill of materials, or a list of the items necessary to support the operations and maintenance of an asset/component, will help to quickly show which components or spare parts are needed during emergencies and when replacements are due. This will ensure that operations continue uninterrupted even in the event of unexpected downtime.

The storage and proximity of these critical spares should be considered when creating this plan. For example, if the spares are stored far away from the site, then it would take longer to reach the facility in event of an emergency. Therefore, having a close-by storeroom makes sense as it would speed up the repair process. Review the best practices for MRO and spare parts in our on-demand webinar.

How MTTR can influence an organizations maintenance strategy

Aside from simply measuring how long it takes for an asset to go from down to fully operational, MTTR can provide useful insights that will influence and drive your organization’s maintenance and reliability strategy.

Measure the maintenance program’s effectiveness

MTTR is a good metric to assess the maintenance processes in place that directly contribute to the speed of your site’s recovery process. This information helps to spotlight inefficiencies in the process and can inform improvement plans.

Pinpoint bottlenecks

By knowing which components require the longest periods of time to recover, you can pinpoint areas where improvements may yield results. For example, if a particular component has been experiencing frequent outages but its MTTR remains low, chances are that the issue lies with the maintenance processes in place rather than the actual asset.

Influence asset investment strategy

MTTR analysis can help you make better decisions about how to spend money on assets by identifying those that will benefit the most from upgrades. While this is not the single way to determine the best investment, you can use MTTR combined with other reliability metrics to establish the decision-making criteria when making these decisions.

For example, if a machine requires constant monitoring and repair, but the cost of repairing it exceeds the value of the machine itself, it would be more beneficial to invest in a replacement rather than a repair. On the contrary, if the same machine only experiences occasional issues, investing in additional resources could prove to be counterproductive and wasteful. A useful method for making this actionable is through Reliability Centered Maintenance, which is a structured method that helps develop an efficient and effective maintenance strategy to minimize the probability of failures.

Find trends and predict future events

Using data collected through an MTTR analysis, you can spot patterns and predict future events. If you notice that certain types of machines consistently experience elevated levels of failure, you can use this knowledge to improve preventive measures. In turn, this reduces the amount of work needed to address breakdowns later down the line.

The technique used to examine an asset, process, or design to determine the potential ways it can fail is known as a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA).

Reduce operational costs

An effective maintenance program reduces unnecessary repairs, which means fewer work hours, overtime, supplies, and materials costs associated with maintaining the asset. These savings can be substantial over time and can be used to fund more maintenance projects.

The value of this knowledge can go a long way.

Beyond a single reliability metric

It is clear that MTTR is useful tool to measure the effectiveness of an organization’s maintenance plans and procedures. However, MTTR is one of several reliability metrics. Although not all metrics apply universally, they can serve as the basis for reviewing maintenance processes and achieving operational excellence.

Another useful metric that we have covered in Reliability 101 is MTBF, which lets you know how long an asset or equipment will run before it experiences a failure. Read more about this valuable metric here.

Share this article:

Get inspired

Copyright - Vitens

Vitens shares how they went from isolated pilots to one centralized data driven asset management organization and strategy.

total cost of ownership

Evaluating and decreasing TCO is becoming more important as industries mature and look to increase profits by reducing costs.

The Power of Collaboration: Uniting Operations and Maintenance

Mark Mulder (CEO): During 15+ years working at MaxGrip, there is one key opportunity emerge: connecting and uniting Maintenance & Operations.